🔗 Share this article

During the previous race for the White House, the former president wooed voters with pledges to lower costs immediately upon taking office. However, after he assumed office, there was minimal attention to affordability issues. All that changed following price-fatigued citizens delivered a rebuke at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team initiated a slapdash campaign to address affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Claims and Supermarket Reality

Just two days post-election, Trump began his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—who frequently associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle every time they go the grocery store. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement about declining prices proved absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. In what way could every price be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics show banana prices increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, the price of beef went up 14.7%, and the cost of coffee surged 18.9%—in part because of punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), drinks (up 2.8%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Financial Statements

In spite of the evidence, the president continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks ignore the reality that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is at a 3 percent per year, that’s half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though government figures indicate they average over three dollars.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many voters are frustrated about rising costs after assurances of reductions. As a result, aides proposed a simple solution: reduce certain import taxes. This sensible idea clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As certain taxes reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, Trump will probably announce that he has lowered costs once these products begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a fire that he had started. In another instance, while speaking fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “we are in the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when millions face cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Truth and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, recently contradicted assertions of a prosperous era. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to widespread concern about affordability, Trump proposed a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. This idea would likely raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

A further supposed fix for affordability centered on creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and slow building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Prospects

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again pointed fingers at the previous president for financial challenges, such as increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” This is unfounded and untruthful claims. In reality, the former president handed over a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—especially import taxes—have resulted in an difficult situation, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, lead analyst at a research firm, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if large states like major economies tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to hold down prices, his primary method for improving living standards might end up pushing the nation into recession—something that hard-pressed households cannot handle.